PoliticsToday

Loopy CNN Physician Claims Court docket Is Filled with Hypocrites on Vax Mandate

At all times one for sounding off like a far-left political pundit, CNN medical analyst and George Washington College physician Jonathan Reiner joined Friday morning’s CNN Newsroom to hold forth on the Supreme Court docket hanging down President Biden’s vaccine mandate for giant companies as “shameful,” accusing the Court docket of hypocrisy. However, in actuality, he simply confirmed he would not know the way broad mandates work.

Visitor co-host Bianna Golodryga prefaced her plea by sustaining Reiner shouldn’t be a authorized analyst, “however you’re a well being skilled and from that perspective, I might love to get your response to what we heard from the Supreme Court docket yesterday, blocking the administration’s mandate for companies, giant companies to impose vaccines and testing however permitting them for some hospitals that present Medicare and Medicaid assist.”

“I am curious, did that ruling make sense out of your perspective and what’s your tackle it,” she added.

 

 

Reiner instantly determined to affirm Golodryga’s evaluation that he’s not a authorized skilled, as a result of he fully ignored the half in regards to the Court docket permitting one other mandate to face: “No. I imply, I assumed that the apparent political leanings of the Court docket have been proven in that resolution.”

Ignoring a number of occasion of misinformation from liberal justices, Reiner lamented: “I used to be additionally struck by the astonishing lack of info as proof by some of the questions posed by some of the justices, notably Justice Thomas, fully misquoting information and misunderstanding how this virus is unfold and, you realize, the Court docket’s resolution, which mainly mentioned that workplaces by and huge should not dangerous locations to accumulate the virus.”

Reiner additionally claimed the Court docket was being hypocritical in its rulings: “You’ll be able to’t enter that Court docket except you’re vaccinated and examined. So the Court docket has cloaked themselves in protections that most workplaces do not have, but they might withhold that from, you realize, hundreds of thousands of staff in the US. I assumed it was a shameful resolution.”

The Supreme Court docket, whose justices are disproportionately older than the typical office, has guidelines that govern itself. What that has to do with the manager department making an attempt to pressure personal companies to do the identical is one thing Reiner could not clarify, nevertheless it wasn’t the primary time the physician wandered out of his lane.

This phase was sponsored by T-Mobile. Their contact info is linked.

Here’s a transcript of the January 14 present. Click on “increase” to learn.

CNN Newsroom with Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto
January 14, 2022
10:19 a.m. Japanese

BIANNA GOLODRYGA: I am going to preface this query by noting the apparent, and that’s that I do not consider you’re a authorized analyst, however — however you’re a well being skilled and from that perspective, I might love to get your response to what we heard from the Supreme Court docket yesterday, blocking the administration’s mandate for companies, giant companies to impose vaccines and testing however permitting them for some hospitals that present Medicare and Medicaid assist. I am curious, did that ruling make sense out of your perspective and what’s your tackle it? 

JONATHAN REINER: No. I imply, I assumed that the apparent political leanings of the Court docket have been proven in that resolution and I am going to — I am going to — I used to be additionally struck by the astonishing lack of info as proof by some of the questions posed by some of the justices, notably Justice Thomas, fully mis — misquoting information and misunderstanding how this virus is unfold and, you realize, the Court docket’s resolution, which mainly mentioned that workplaces by and huge should not dangerous locations to accumulate the virus be — counter to what the Court docket has arrange. You’ll be able to’t enter that Court docket —

JIM SCIUTTO: Yeah.

REINER: — except you’re vaccinated and examined. So the Court docket has cloaked themselves in protections that most workplaces do not have, but they might withhold that from, you realize, hundreds of thousands of staff in the US. I assumed it was —

SCIUTTO: Yeah.

REINER: — a shameful resolution.

SCIUTTO: Ariane de Vogue, our Supreme Court docket reporter, made that time final hour that the justices themselves? vaccinated.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button